Why User Engagement feels like trying to catch smoke

User attention has never been more trickier to hold on to. In 2025, digital behaviour is shaped as a paradox: customers expect powerful service tools and personalised product experiences, however patience for ___-__ is ______. The average consumer jumps between a dozen apps, different devices and half-read notifications like it's an Olympic sport. Engagement is fragile and has to be earned every single day, and with that many options only a swipe away, users naturally gravitate towards the product with the loudest, clearest and most convincing communication.

Take a look at these sobering statistics

Data emerging this year paints a picture of users who move quickly, judge harshly and disengage silently. These stat's don't just show trends, they reveal the growing gap between what users actually want and what product teams think they want.

The Onboarding Cliff

72% of users abandon apps during onboarding if it requires too many steps

According to Clutch, 2025, there is a noticeable pattern where nearly 3 out of 4 new users leave if onboarding feels like an obstacle course instead of a smooth introduction. Poor onboarding may appear in the form of ______ or if users cannot grasp
Best onboarding processes explain the project ________, have skippable steps and include a 

okay redo

The Onboarding Cliff

One of the most noticeable patterns of 2025 is the “onboarding cliff,” where nearly three-quarters of new users leave within days if the product doesn't explain itself clearly. This tells us something important: users are no longer willing to experiment. They have no interest in figuring things out through trial and error. If they can't understand the core functionality quickly, they disengage before ever seeing the value.
For many teams, this is a painful truth. A product may be brilliant, powerful, and cleverly designed, but if users cannot grasp it instantly, the brilliance never gets experienced. Poor onboarding doesn't just kill engagement. It prevents it from ever beginning. A confusing onboarding experience communicates one message: this will cost you more time than it’s worth. And for modern users, time is the ultimate dealbreaker.

Feature Updates Are Invisible

61% of users say updates feel unclear or unnoticed

Users today are extremely selective about where they focus their attention. Even when companies work tirelessly to ship new features, improvements, and fixes, most users don’t notice unless the update is clearly explained, contextualised, and visually demonstrated.
This statistic highlights a deeper issue: shipping features no longer guarantees they will be adopted. The real challenge is not releasing updates, it’s communicating them. In a crowded digital world, users skim more than they read. They ignore anything that resembles technical jargon. And they don’t change their habits without motivation. Without clear explanations, practical examples, or visuals showing the benefit of each change, updates dissolve into noise.
Teams often assume progress is self-evident. But users don’t see the backend work, the sprint cycles, the hours of planning, or the internal conversations. If an update isn’t clearly communicated, it may as well have never happened.

Transparency Drives Loyalty

Public roadmaps correlate with a 28% increase in long-term retention

What stood out strongly in 2025’s engagement research is the role transparency plays in user loyalty. Modern users want to understand the direction of a product before they commit to it. They want to know which features are coming, how priorities are shaped, and whether their own feedback has any influence.
A public roadmap functions as an unspoken agreement between teams and customers: We’re building this, and you’re invited to follow along.
The rise of SaaS transparency culture has transformed roadmaps into trust-building tools. When users see a roadmap, they no longer fear stagnation. They no longer wonder if the product will evolve or keep up with their needs. They feel assured that they’re investing in something alive, responsive, and actively improving. This reassurance extends engagement far beyond the initial signup.

The Trust Gap

83% of users trust peer reviews more than brand messaging

This figure is not just a trend, it's an indictment of how traditional marketing has lost influence. People simply do not trust brands the way they used to. They trust outcomes, other user experiences, and proof that a product actually delivers value.
Testimonials, reviews, case studies, and real-world examples have become the primary decision drivers. A user may scroll past five paragraphs of marketing copy, but pause for a single sentence from a real customer. In an era where nearly every product claims to be the “best,” the only voice that truly cuts through skepticism is another user’s.
This shift reveals a new reality for SaaS teams: the strength of your community is as important as the strength of your product. And if you are not showcasing social proof, users assume none exists.

Documentation Debt

52% of support tickets stem from questions that could be answered through better help content

Support teams continue to drown not because products are inherently complex, but because knowledge is scattered. The rise of “documentation debt” in 2025 describes the backlog of information that exists but is not organised, not accessible, or not written in a user-friendly way.
Repeated questions, time-consuming support cycles, and frustrated users all stem from the same issue: users cannot find what they need independently. And when customers can’t self-serve, they disengage. Worse, they lose confidence. A product without clear documentation signals disorganisation, lack of care, and poor internal alignment.
A modern user wants answers instantly, not after waiting hours for a response, repeating screenshots, or navigating outdated help pages. If support becomes a bottleneck, engagement breaks down.

Fragile Engagement

One negative experience can push 1 in 3 users to abandon a product permanently

This is perhaps the most sobering statistic: modern users don’t give second chances. One confusing interaction, one unresolved bug, or one unexpected error can be enough to break the relationship entirely. Digital loyalty has never been more delicate.
This behavioural shift is tied to expectations. Users know alternatives exist. They know switching tools is easy. And they know they can stop using a product with a single click. A single negative experience doesn’t just disrupt engagement, it signals to users that the product may cause more frustration in the future.
The implication for teams is clear: consistency matters more than perfection. Users don’t need every feature to be flawless, but they do need a sense of reliability and clear communication when things go wrong.

Active Communication

Products that share updates weekly see 22% higher engagement

The final pattern emerging in 2025 is the importance of continuity. Products that communicate consistently, even if the updates are small, maintain dramatically higher user engagement. Activity signals momentum. Momentum signals life. And a product that feels alive is a product users stick with.
Weekly communication doesn’t need to be grand or dramatic. Even minor improvements, UI tweaks, new FAQs, or bug fixes remind users: We’re here. We’re improving. We’re listening.
Silence, on the other hand, breeds uncertainty. And uncertainty kills engagement faster than any bug.

The role of User Mastery in the 2025 Engagement Landscape

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla quis felis aliquet, egestas mauris quis, condimentum velit. Praesent scelerisque, nisi vel fringilla dapibus, nisl nibh efficitur nunc, ac viverra leo velit tempor orci. Nunc euismod vulputate rhoncus. Aenean gravida leo in neque congue cursus.
Ut gravida ex in ipsum tincidunt, ut pulvinar erat aliquam. In elementum nulla velit, nec rutrum nibh pellentesque eu. Integer id diam ut dui molestie pulvinar. Nam efficitur ante lorem, quis sollicitudin libero rhoncus id. Nulla at elit in lectus ullamcorper tincidunt. Mauris vitae faucibus metus. Nulla enim dui, laoreet in tincidunt at, rutrum et risus. Cras consequat scelerisque turpis, at faucibus neque. Vestibulum in enim justo. Aliquam eget porta ex. Donec vitae mattis mauris. Suspendisse luctus urna sed justo dapibus maximus. Nulla porttitor ultricies ante, sit amet dictum odio. Donec bibendum tellus ac felis dapibus, at varius augue pretium. Aliquam eu nibh leo.

Was this page helpful?